Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 08:12

What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How do I deal with autistic burnout/meltdown/shutdown when cooking?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Research suggests Big Bang may have taken place inside a black hole - Hacker News
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Hollywood actress popular for hit ’70s shows dead at 95 - NJ.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are some reasons why some people may be against stay-at-home dads or working moms?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Nobel laureate concerned about AI-generated image of black hole at the center of our galaxy - Space
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Checkers Drop Game 1 of Finals in Double Overtime - Charlotte Checkers Hockey